ball tampering? tea interval?
On Sunday, an umpire presiding at a high-profile game between England and Pakistan, ruled that, in his belief, Pakistani players had been tampering with the ball and he told Pakistani players of his suspicion, awarding England five bonus runs, or points.
By way of protest, the Pakistanis refused to leave their dressing room after a scheduled break for tea. The Australian umpire, Darrell Hair, a person known for contentious rulings against some Asian teams, then removed the “bails” — those little wooden bits that fit horizontally across the top of the larger wooden stakes called stumps — denoting that Pakistan had forfeited the game.
The Pakistan team, nonetheless, walked back onto the field of play. But by this time the umpires had walked off, having ruled that Pakistan’s no-show constituted a terminal offense. Game to England — the first time in 129 years of so-called Test matches between national teams that a game had been forfeited in this way.
1 Comments:
Darryl O Hair is a stickler for fair play when it comes to ball tampering and regulation tea breaks... there has to be a moral in this.. let me take a shot:
If you're gonna play silly-buggers with balls, make sure you don't get caught up with the Hair
best - MATT
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home